Skip to content

Ranked by measured pay

The highest-paying AI training platforms right now

Not a listicle of self-reported maximums. This ranks the platforms by the median hourly rate their open roles actually advertise, measured from each platform’s live job feed and refreshed daily. Want to model your own number instead? Estimate your rate in the pay explorer.

Live pay updated 9 hrs ago

The short answer

, Babel Audio has the highest median advertised rate of the 17 AI training platforms ranked on AITraining.jobs: $105 an hour, followed by Mindrift at $100 and RemoExperts at $95.

Expert networks lead the ranking because they hire for specialized work: formal proofs, advanced coding, and PhD-level domain review pay far above general microtasks. Every figure is the median of the rates those platforms’ own open roles advertise, not a headline maximum.

The ranking

Ranked by live measured median pay

Highest median advertised hourly rate first. Each band shows the typical pay its open roles pay (the 25th percentile of what roles pay (the middle of each advertised range) to the 90th-percentile advertised ceiling), and the receipt for how it was measured.

  1. Measured from 23 distinct advertised rates, on this platform. 20 of the 43 open roles here state no hourly rate.

  2. Measured from 253 distinct advertised rates, on this platform. 44 advertise only a maximum ("up to $X/hr"), which is excluded.

  3. Measured from 34 distinct advertised rates, on this platform. 1 of the 36 open roles here states no hourly rate; 1 advertises only a maximum ("up to $X/hr"), which is excluded.

  4. Measured from 11 distinct advertised rates, on this platform. 158 advertise only a maximum ("up to $X/hr"), which is excluded.

  5. Measured from 15 distinct advertised rates, on this platform. 10 of the 25 open roles here state no hourly rate.

  6. Measured from 17 distinct advertised rates, on this platform. 2 of the 20 open roles here state no hourly rate.

  7. Measured from 194 distinct advertised rates, on this platform. 37 of the 232 open roles here state no hourly rate.

  8. Measured from 217 distinct advertised rates, on this platform.

  9. Measured from 243 distinct advertised rates, on this platform. 6 of the 249 open roles here state no hourly rate.

  10. Measured from 528 distinct advertised rates, on this platform. 4 of the 532 open roles here state no hourly rate.

  11. Measured from 393 distinct advertised rates, on this platform.

  12. Measured from 15 distinct advertised rates, on this platform.

  13. Measured from 128 distinct advertised rates, on this platform.

  14. Measured from 41 distinct advertised rates, on this platform. 1 of the 42 open roles here states no hourly rate.

  15. Measured from 57 distinct advertised rates, on this platform. 21 of the 78 open roles here state no hourly rate.

  16. Measured from 183 distinct advertised rates, on this platform. 52 of the 235 open roles here state no hourly rate.

  17. Measured from 60 distinct advertised rates, on this platform.

Ranked on the median advertised hourly rate, so a single high posting cannot lift a platform. A platform needs at least 8 distinct advertised rates on its live feed to be ranked here. Typical pay is the 25th percentile of what roles pay (the middle of each advertised range) to the 90th-percentile advertised ceiling, measured the same way on every page. How we compile pay.

Also high-paying

Strong payers not yet live-measured

These platforms pay well by every compiled account but do not currently publish enough live hourly rates for a measured median. Their pay shows the compiled benchmark until their feed does.

Pasiflora AI logo
Pasiflora AI

Expert network

$35-250/hr

Compiled benchmark

7 open
RealTrainAI logo
RealTrainAI

Expert network

$15-$200+/hr

Compiled benchmark

Prolific logo
Prolific

Research studies

$8–$150/hr

Compiled benchmark

Some platforms pay per task or per project rather than by the hour, so they are not ranked against an hourly wage. See them all in the full platform directory.

Some links on AITraining.jobs are referral links. If you sign up through one, AITraining.jobs may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes what a platform pays you. Ranking is by measured pay only; partner status never changes a platform’s place in it. See our methodology.

Job alerts

Get new AI training jobs by email

The newest paid roles across every platform we track, with real hourly pay, in one weekly email. Free, and unsubscribe anytime.

We email new roles, not spam. One click to unsubscribe.

Highest-paying AI training platforms: common questions

What is the highest-paying AI training platform right now?

Measured from live job feeds as of 18 Oct 2026, Babel Audio has the highest median advertised hourly rate at $105/hr (typical $105–$150/hr). Mindrift ($100/hr) and RemoExperts ($95/hr) follow. The figure reflects what open roles actually advertise, not a self-reported maximum, and updates daily as the feeds refresh. What you personally earn still depends on the specific work and your skills.

How much do the top AI-training platforms pay per hour?

The highest-paying platforms cluster between $85 and $105/hr at the median, with specialized expert work (formal proofs, advanced coding, PhD-level domain review) reaching $450/hr on the board today. Across the whole market the typical role runs lower, because microtask and data-labeling work priced by geography sits at the other end. Every band on this page names how many rates it was measured from.

Can beginners earn the highest rates?

Usually not at first. The top of this ranking is dominated by expert networks that hire for specialized skills, so the highest rates go to people with real domain expertise. Beginners typically start on the accessible microtask crowds at lower pay, then move up as they build a track record. If you are new, start with the plain-language guides to each kind of work.

How is this ranking measured?

Each platform is ranked by the median hourly rate advertised across its own live open roles, counted only when its board publishes at least eight distinct advertised rates (so a single posting cannot set the ranking). Rates advertised only as a maximum are excluded, and platforms that pay per task or per project are not ranked against an hourly wage. The numbers refresh daily from the platforms' own job feeds.

Why isn't every platform on AITraining.jobs in this ranking?

A platform appears in the measured ranking only when its live feed publishes enough hourly rates to compute a reliable median. Some platforms pay per task or per project rather than by the hour, and some do not post enough live rates yet. Those are listed below the measured ranking or in the full directory, with their compiled benchmark, so nothing is hidden, it is just labeled honestly.

Keep exploring

Pick the platform, then the work and the pay.

Pay is one axis. Compare two platforms head to head, see what each kind of work pays, or browse every open role right now.

Compare two platforms

Head-to-head on pay, ease of entry, work model, and live open roles, so you can choose between the two you are weighing.

See comparisons →

Pay by kind of work

The same live pay data cut by the work itself: RLHF, coding, STEM, labeling, and more, each with its measured range.

Open the pay explorer →

Every open role

The daily-refreshed feed of live roles across every tracked platform, filterable by work type and country.

Browse live roles →